Why British Lawmakers Are Fighting Over a Bust of Oliver CromwellBreaking News
tags: British history, art, Oliver Cromwell
Beginning in autumn 2017, a bust of Oliver Cromwell in the Members’ Tea Room in Parliament’s London House was repeatedly turned toward the wall in a decidedly undignified fashion.
Commons officials eventually cordoned off the statue with a sign saying “Fragile—please do not touch,” but their efforts were to no avail. The bust was continually moved to face the wall.
If you aren’t too familiar with British history, Cromwell, the lord protector who oversaw the governance of England, Scotland and Ireland following the English Civil War is a deeply divisive figure whose polarizing status stems from his brutal conquest of Ireland during the mid-1600s. As Naomi Rea reports for artnet News, he is alternately lauded as the “heroic military and political leader” who defended Parliament and vilified as a ruthless war criminal responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent Catholics.
Labour Party Member of Parliament Stephen Pound sides with the latter group. Writing for the Times, Sam Coates notes that the MP for Ealing North and shadow minister for Northern Ireland has objected to the bust’s presence in the House of Commons for years.
It may not surprise you, then, to learn that the small act of defiance was spearheaded by Pound, who was spurred to take action upon the bust’s recent move to the stairwell beside the MPs’ tea room. A break in the case arrived when colleagues outed Pound as the culprit behind the rotating bust.
But the story isn’t over. As Harry Yorke writes for the Telegraph, Commons officials recently escalated the disagreement by moving the statue to a new home—namely, just outside of Pound’s private office.
comments powered by Disqus
- Archivist and bookseller plead guilty to pilfering $8M in rare texts from Carnegie Library
- The chief justice who presided over the first presidential impeachment trial thought it was political spectacle
- Hundreds of Britons Volunteered for a Diary-Keeping Project in 1937. They Left an Invaluable Record of World War II
- Fact check: After Pearl Harbor, Japanese didn't invade US because they feared armed citizens?
- How Political Divides Shape U.S. History Lessons
- AHA Encourages History Departments to Provide Full Library Access to Alumni and to Unaffiliated Historians in their Regions
- Clayborne Carson Interviewed by World Socialist Web Site on 1619 Project
- “A staggering tour de force – but an opportunity missed”: a historian’s review of the film 1917
- NY Journal of Books Reviews Wilmington's Lie: The Murderous Coup of 1898 and the Rise of White Supremacy
- AHA Enrollment Study Finds History Enrollments Hold Study as Department Efforts Intensify