Barr Campaign Digs Its Hole Deeper
And then there's more praise for Bush: Barr says,"The Bush administration deserves credit for having done much to disable al Qaeda as an effective terrorist organization." What? Al Qaeda is bigger and badder than ever, thanks to the war on terror. As the CIA's former Bin Laden Unit chief Michael Scheuer has argued consistently, both wars – in Iraq and Afghanistan – have played into Osama's hands and empowered al Qaeda. Seven years after 9/11, libertarians should not continue the mistake made by many in endorsing any aspect of the war on terror. Any credit to Bush is too much credit.
This is really amazing. The same campaign that was willing to praise Jesse Helms, Al Gore and now George Bush, a campaign that has flip-flopped on global warming, gay marriage, the drug war and other issues, is now attacking the most popular libertarian activist movement in modern history, and attacking Ron Paul the person for caring more about himself than spreading the message of freedom – perhaps the most bizarre accusation one could make.
When Barr first got the nomination, I predicted he would not break 700,000 votes, despite hysterically optimistic estimates of millions of votes. Now, I would be somewhat surprised if he got more votes than Michael Badnarik.
comments powered by Disqus
Bill Woolsey - 9/16/2008
The close to 100,000 members of the campaign for liberty (which includes me,) make up 10% of the number of people who volunteered Barr or the LP as their voting choice this summer (1%). Most of Barr's poll results (where they include his name) have been better. In September there has been a 1%, 2%, and a 3% result.
I am still voting for Barr. I know others who are closely tied to the Campaign for Liberty who will do so as well.
I think it is yet another mistep by the Barr campaign.
The "problem" with Paul's news conference was Nader. He is Barr's key competitor for protest votes. But, objectively, what difference did it make? One day of news coverage?
I think what we are now seeing is members of staff carrying out the threats they made in negotiations. If Barr doesn't show, I will... If Nader is there, we will....
Efforts to force me to "choose" between Barr and Paul just make me a bit more disappointed in the partisans of both camps.
I believe that the Barr campaign is the best way to promote a libertarian message between now and November.
After that, only time will tell. Paul's effort proved that there is great potential for spreading the libertarian message in Republican primary campaigns. Will a good candidate arise in the future? We will see.
Lester Hunt - 9/11/2008
I'm very disappointed by this. I just got an email from his campaign manager repeating some of these petty, pointlessly nasty comments and charges. I'm not uprooting my Barr yard sign just yet, but I am getting there.
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Mary Beard, herself a bestselling author, wonders why more women historians aren't
- Princeton U. historian Imani Perry claims mistreatment in parking ticket arrest
- Retired historian George Dennison remains on the payroll at the U. of Montana while faculty are cut
- The Atlantic profiles exciting ways to teach history
- LDS Church has gone from 0 to 4 historians specializing in women’s history