LIKE SADDAM, W EMPLOYS "MINDERS" TO INTIMIDATE WITNESSES
Terry points to this passage from an article yesterday in the NYT:
The federal commission investigating the Sept. 11 terror attacks said today that its work was being hampered by the failure of executive branch agencies, especially the Pentagon and the Justice Department, to respond quickly to requests for documents and testimony. ...Terry then points to this passage from W's now infamously truth-challenged State of the Union address:
At a news conference, Mr. Kean described the presence of"minders" at the interviews as a form of intimidation."I think the commission feels unanimously that it's some intimidation to have somebody sitting behind you all the time who you either work for or works for your agency," he said."You might get less testimony than you would."
"We would rather interview these people without minders or without agency people there," he said.
...Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.You know, it really takes a special kind of hypocrite (and we all know W is just that kind of animal) to employ police-state-style scare tactics to intimidate Congress's investigation into 9/11 after having attacked Saddam for doing exactly the same thing. Heck, W even went further and argued it showed Saddam's guilt with regard to WMDs.
The dictator of Iraq is not disarming. To the contrary; he is deceiving. From intelligence sources we know, for instance, that thousands of Iraqi security personnel are at work hiding documents and materials from the U.N. inspectors, sanitizing inspection sites and monitoring the inspectors themselves. Iraqi officials accompany the inspectors in order to intimidate witnesses.
Using W's logic, shouldn't we therefore draw the conclusion that, regarding 9/11 at least, this administration" clearly has much to hide."
Wish to comment on this post? Click here
comments powered by Disqus
- A New Target for Old Spies: Congress
- Antigua and Barbuda Asks Harvard University for Slavery Reparations
- Historian: Nixon DID contest the 1960 election
- Killer took selfie after stabbing historian over rare ‘Wind in the Willows’ book
- VW fires corporate historian who drew attention to wartime ties to Nazis
- Historian Jeremy Kuzmarov calls on Obama to pardon Ethel Rosenberg
- Garry Wills says there’s one human test we can use to decide who’s the better candidate: Trump or Clinton
- Get to Know the Semifinalists for the National Book Award
- Steven Runciman — historian, tease and professional enigma — is the subject of a biography
- Historian Eric Foner: Trump is Logical Conclusion of What the GOP Has Been Doing for Decades