Blogs > HNN > PUNDITS' INTELECTUAL HONESTY OR DISHONESTY

Feb 20, 2005 10:09 pm


PUNDITS' INTELECTUAL HONESTY OR DISHONESTY



Then came the Afghani, Palestinian and Iraqi elections and now the specter of a Lebanese uprising. The McLoughlin group was amazing. So protective were some of the not so mavens of Syria and Assad Fils that John McLouglhlin announced that Syria bordered Iran and Eleanor Clift informed us that without Lebanon, Syria would be a land locked country. Luckily, they invited a Lebanese to correct them.

He was much less enamored with Syria. Yes, Arab intellectuals are coming around and so are honest pundits like Fareed Zakaria (Standing Up for People Power )and Tom Friedman ( When Camels Fly ). Zakaria told Stephanapolis that the pundits were wrong. The Arab people do want democracy and the rule of law. Moreover, they elected moderates who behave decently. Yes. We were right to trust the people. Poor people, they will have risk their lives and, indeed, at time pay with their lives to get rid of those who wish to keep them slaves.

For the latest examples of their"Hama Rules," see, Raped Darfur women wrestle with fate of babies and Shiite holy day is deadly day in Iraq



comments powered by Disqus