American Historical Association AnnouncementHistorians/History
This announcment was dispatched by email to AHA members on January 27, 2005. Readers wishing to comment can do so at the bottom of this page.
The American Historical Association is proud to announce the most comprehensive revision of its Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct since that document was first adopted in 1987 is now available on the AHAs web site at http://www.historians.org/pubs/Free/ProfessionalStandards.cfm. The Statement on Standards has become the historical profession's most widely consulted authority concerning questions of ethical practice. Our goal in this new edition has been to add to its strengths without weakening it in any way.
The most important revisions include:
- Streamlining the text: Because the Statement has gone through many editions, with contributions from many individuals and committees, it has had an inevitable tendency to lose rhetorical and literary coherence over time. One goal was to rewrite the entire text to impose a more uniform style and voice on the whole, without sacrificing or altering any of the important statements of principle it contains.
- Addressing the entire profession: Earlier editions of the Statement have been marked by a fairly pervasive bias in which the "historians" it addresses and describes are assumed to work in academic institutions. Public historians in particular have felt understandably marginalized by the text, and the AHA's Task Force on Public History strongly recommended last year that the Statement be revised so as to remove as much as possible its academic biases. This new version is much more inclusive of the full range of professional historians working in many different institutional settings.
- Speaking to common values: The Statement now opens with two sections that are entirely new. The first defines what we mean by "The Profession of History," and the second seeks to describe and explain the "Shared Values of Historians." Our belief is that many of the professional and ethical dilemmas historians face can actually best be addressed by referring to the underlying values that inform our work.
- Consolidating policies: This document is not intended to offer major new policy statements. Although there are a few minor clarifications of current policy here and there in the text, the primary goal has been to synthesize and integrate AHA policy concerning professional conduct as it has evolved over the years. One of the ways that the Statement has evolved over the past 17 years has been through the occasional addition of formal policy declarations, drafted by the AHA Professional Division and approved by AHA Council, which have been published as an ever-extending string of appendices to the document. This draft eliminates the appendices by incorporating their spirit or substance at appropriate locations in the main body of the text.
We hope and believe that this new 2005 edition of the Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct will be of use not just to professional historians, but to students, journalists, employers, scholars in allied fields, and anyone interested in questions pertaining to ethical conduct in the practice of history. Printed copies will be distributed to departments and individual members (and available on request to all interested parties) early in the spring.
The revisions were drafted by William J. Cronon (Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison), who served as vice-president for professional issues from 2002 to 2005, in consultation with current and immediate past members of the Professional Division, including James Grossman (Newberry Library); Peter Hoffer (Univ. of Georgia); Mary Lindemann (Univ. of Miami); Maureen Murphy Nutting (North Seattle Community College); Susan Stuard (Haverford College); Stefan Tanaka (Univ. of California at San Diego); and Denise J. Youngblood (Univ. of Vermont). Important contributions were also made by members of the Task Force on Public History (especially its chair, Linda Shopes); by AHA General Council, Albert Beveridge; and, not least, by AHA staff members, most especially Sharon K. Tune and Arnita Jones.
Along with the new Statement, the Association has also published new curricular materials on the subject of plagiarism, prepared by Michael Rawson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison. These are now available online at http://www.historians.org/governance/pd/Curriculum/plagiarism_intro.htm. The new materials are offer wise counsel to teachers seeking to help students understand and avoid plagiarism, as well as specific information and exercises for undergraduate and graduate students.
comments powered by Disqus
- Snopes debunks slavery Internet meme
- Revamped Chinese History Journal Welcomes Hard-Line Writers
- Poll: 3 Out of 5 Texan Trump Supporters Want Secession if Hillary Clinton Is Elected
- The Psychiatric Question: Is It Fair to Analyze Donald Trump From Afar?
- Minorities still feel Eugene, Oregon’s historical link to the Ku Klux Klan
- Ernst Nolte, Historian Whose Views on Hitler Caused an Uproar, Dies at 93
- Japan should give formal apology for wartime aggression, says historian
- Historian Benjamin Madley says what whites did to Indians in the 19th century in California was genocide.
- Kevin Baker says America needs to bring back political machines
- Covell Meyskens uses his blog to show what life was like under Mao. (Interview)