Tortured Reasoning and Tortured Results
"There's a word for this: it's evil."
Is there something more painful for Americans than hearing that illegal CIA methods caused the deaths of dozens upon dozens of detainees, inflicted pain on hundreds of others, and that this brutality that had nothing to do with national security? Yes -- learning it was done to validate one of the leading lies that sent us to war. First British Intelligence's “Downing Street Memo” to Tony Blair revealed, “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the [Bush] policy.” Now Senator Carl Levin's 263 page Armed Services Committee report (unanimously approved by Senators McCain, Graham and Lieberman) fills in more blanks. Levin says our top political officials were “driven” to install this torture program. “They'd say it was to get more information. But they were desperate to find a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq,” Levin told columnist Frank Rich.
Sure, al-Qa'ida glorifies martyrdom and plays by no known rules. But our authorizing torture and accepting its lies is about us. Its about Americans who went along with “kick some ass,” bring 'em on,” and “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Under orders from top officials our CIA waterboarded one man 183 times and another 83 (hardly proof that it works!). It sent mentally ill Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi to a Lybian prison where he was tortured and locked in a small box for 17 hours until he agreed to say there was a link between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. The CIA discredited his confession and he withdrew it. But not before Secretary of State Colin Powell in February 2003 used his words -- “a senior terrorist operative” divulged “how Iraq provided training in these [chemical and biological] weapons to al-Qaeda” -- to sell the Iraq invasion to the UN Security Council and the world. The recently released Torture Memos providing legal cover for"harsh interrogations" were written during his ordeal. (This May Libi died suddenly in his Lybian prison"an apparent suicide.”)
First, we have to admit that torture worked. It produced a narrative used to frighten Americans and justify a war of aggression. It also worked in other ways. It recruited untold numbers into the ranks of al-Qaeda, made a mockery of U.S. claims to moral leadership, and now places U.S. soldiers and civilians in danger.
The program's bad apples were not the few U.S. jailers now serving time, but our top leaders. They discussed, issued or signed off on illegal orders and ignored dissenting lawyers. Waterboarding is torture, a crime that violates international and U.S. laws. Crimes are more than mistakes. Americans who violate traffic laws face the wheels of justice. What about those who violate human rights?
HNN Hot Topics: Torture
comments powered by Disqus
Lorraine Paul - 5/19/2009
I, for one, would like Mr Loewen to expand on his analysis of the article. I dare to hope that he will.
Jonathan Dresner - 5/18/2009
That's one of the more opaque comments I've seen in a while.
James W Loewen - 5/18/2009
This is exactly the kind of reasoning and evidence we would expect from a senior historian who has done pioneering research on previously little-known topics like race relations in the American West.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing