Lewis Lapham's new history and current events magazine getting very mixed reviewsHistorians in the News
Mr. Lapham, who edited Harper’s Magazine for nearly 30 years, retired from that job in 2006 only to start a new publication, Lapham’s Quarterly, which reached newsstands last month. Unlike Harper’s, which tackles a blend of topics each month, the new journal takes on a single subject — in the debut issue, war — and offers writings about it from ancient to modern times....
He acknowledged that the publication, which costs $15 an issue, would not appeal to a mass audience. But he said he was encouraged by the popularity of the History Channel and by sales of books like David McCullough’s biography of John Adams.
“The great rush of the electronic media tends to eliminate the past,” he said. “Everything is right now or 20 minutes from now, and this gives a sense of context and continuity. People like that.”
Apparently not all people. In The New Criterion, a conservative monthly journal, Roger Kimball, the editor, twice used the word “pretentiousness” in his assessment of the new magazine. He said Mr. Lapham’s “command of inconsequentiality has elicited comment for years.” Robert Wilson, editor of The American Scholar, found Lapham’s Quarterly “very smart” but said that because of the many contributors who were dead, “it feels a little like a museum.”
Samir A. Husni, the head of the journalism department at the University of Mississippi, said, “It’s not something that I would come back from work and say, ‘O.K., let me relax, have a glass of wine and read this magazine,’ which I would have done with Harper’s.” He added, “If you are interested in this topic, in those books, you have probably read them, you have probably spent time with them. And if you are not familiar with them, the presentation is not inviting.”
comments powered by Disqus
Randll Reese Besch - 1/2/2008
From what I have assessed from the article the magazine doesn't want the likes of me reading it. The cost alone puts it in the relm of the academic or university, maybe libraries if they have the money. Outside of my price range. I would be interested in reading at least one issue to fully review if its body is firm and substantial in its scholarship and 'meat' of the topic covered.
- 159 scholars at Harvard sign petition reprimanding the school for rejections of Chelsea Manning and Michelle Jones
- Fact Check: Steve Bannon’s Bad History
- The Story Behind the Truman Quote in President Trump's U.N. Speech
- As Trump Declares Missing in Action Recognition Day, How Many Service Members Are Missing?
- The ‘nation’s report card’ says it assesses critical thinking in history
- Eric Foner discusses the manipulation of history
- Male historian tapped to lead Department of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University of Kansas
- Decline in History Majors Continues, Departments Respond
- He’s 75 now. When he started teaching at the University of New Orleans students walked out on his class.
- ‘Fake news’ from 1738 offers lessons for modern historians, says Missouri scholar