Frank J. Williams: Parallel Passages that Raise Questions About a Chapter He Wrote in the 1990s
Devoted Abraham Lincoln scholar and state Supreme Court Chief Justice Frank J. Williams acknowledged last week that he"inadvertently" used the opening paragraphs of a 1957 Journal magazine story in an article he wrote on Lincoln in 1993."I feel terrible, mortified, embarrassed," Williams said."I take full responsibility for it." -- MARK ARSENAULT, Providence Journal, April 6, 2004
The Providence Journal reported this week that Frank J. Williams wrote an article in 1993 that was substantially similar to another article (by Kenneth B. Roberts) published by the Providence Journal's Sunday magazine in 1957. Williams's 1993 article, which concerned Abraham Lincoln's visits to Rhode Island, appeared in Rhode Island History, which was published by the Rhode Island Historical Society.
The paper found that "the opening 250 words of each article" were similar. (See below.) Williams explained that he must have come across the 1957 article when he was writing a lecture for the Lincoln Group of Boston in the 1970s. He explained that when he wrote the 1993 article he must have assumed that his notes on the 1957 article recorded his own words.
According to the Providence Journal account, Williams said "[h]e is unaware of any similar instances in his writing." But an HNN reader has brought to our attention passages that appeared in one of Williams's scholarly works that closely parallel the words used by other writers. Williams was made aware of the parallels in 2002.
The passages appear in Williams's, "Lincoln and Leadership: An International Perspective," a chapter in Abraham Lincoln: Sources and Style of Leadership, edited by Frank J. Williams, William D. Pederson, and Vincent J. Marsala (Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1994). (See below.) Co-editor William Pederson told HNN that the passage taken from James G. Randall wasn't properly credited because of an error made in copyingediting.
Contacted by HNN, Mr. Williams sent us this statement:
I take very seriously my responsibility to accurately cite sources in any scholarly work. I am sensitive to the proper protocol for quoting and footnoting, especially since many of my dozens of articles and writings are published in periodicals which serve the academic world. At the same time it is surely worth remembering that within this community sometimes even a trivial stylistic debate arising over copy-editing can be magnified.
Such is the case regarding the passages which are referenced from Lincoln and Leadership: An International Perspective. These passages either involved different phrasing or were clearly cited with proper footnotes or quotations when first written in accordance with accepted academic standards used by many other writers.
The stylistic debate over copywriting is not at all similar to that of the inadvertent error involving the 1993 article in the Rhode Island History Magazine which I have acknowledged and explained and for which I have sincerely apologized to the History Magazine, the Providence Journal and my readers.
Re: Frank Williams, "Lincoln and Leadership: An International Perspective"
comments powered by Disqus
William B. Palazzo - 4/9/2008
Does this sound like the behavior of a Lincoln Scholar. Abe wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole.
Please see: www.RISupremeCourt.com to see what Justice Williams is truly about.
- South Dakota drops history as a high school requirement
- The Forgotten History Of 'Violent Displacement' That Helped Create The National Parks
- Gospel of Jesus’ Wife May Be Authentic, New Tests Suggest
- Architect Sought for Obama’s Presidential Library Complex
- 2016 election's leading candidates have strong Jewish family ties
- Historians tackle America’s mass incarceration problem
- Report: Russian studies in crisis
- Ken Burns: Donald Trump’s birtherism — a “politer way of saying the ‘N-word'” — proves America isn’t remotely “post-racial”
- Medievalist calls on historians to welcome pop culture
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?