Rosanne Adderley: Colleagues rally to her defense at Tulane
As we reported,"The origins of the imbroglio can be traced to complaints by Rosanne Adderley, the only African-American member of the department, that she was the victim of discrimination for years." After the story was published several of her colleagues protested to HNN that our story unfairly stigmatized Professor Adderley. They contacted members of our advisory board to complain that our coverage was biased. We explained that because Professor Adderley declined to be interviewed for the story it was difficult to present a balanced piece. The article featured quotes from her chief critics and none from her. We invited her supporters to provide a statement in her defense. On April 11 they posted the following comment on the discussion board attached to the article. It was signed by 35 people. The department of history numbers 21 people (excluding visiting professors), according to the Tulane website. Five, including the current chairman, signed the statement.
We, the 35 current and former members of the Tulane faculty listed below, find that this article represents Rosanne Adderley in a negative light that in no way corresponds with her professional identity at Tulane University. Rosanne Adderley has been an extremely active, positive, friendly, hard working and helpful colleague. Moreover, she is a person of utmost integrity, and we believe that all of her professional dealings are conducted in good faith as a matter of course. We assert unequivocally that this story is misleading. A grave injustice has been done here. The Rosanne Adderley that we know is not, as the article implies, a troublemaker. Indeed, she is the very opposite.
comments powered by Disqus
Emily Ratner - 11/15/2007
Although I knew Rosanne Adderley from the perspective of a student and not that of a colleague, I'd like to add my name to Dr. Adderley's long list of supporters. Dr. Adderley is a compassionate, warm, and dedicated professor. She acted as chief advisor for the theses of several of my friends in both History and Latin American Studies and her students and former students speak glowingly of their experience with her. She is known throughout Tulane's campus as being very tough but also fair, and helps students prepare for careers and further higher learning opportunities both through her high expectations and her undying support.
I am deeply disappointed that a "news network" would publish such a one-sided story. Tulane's investigation of the claim clearly demonstrates that Dr. Adderley acted in good faith and even admits that one of the professors involved treats junior faculty "somewhat haughtily," suggesting that in at least one case Dr. Adderley was not alone in being treated unfairly. Furthermore, Dr. Adderley made her complaint through the appropriate channels in a professional and confidential manner and yet her character and credentials have been attacked in a very public and tawdry way. Perhaps in some academic circles such poor research and reporting is considered acceptable, but on Tulane’s campus Shenkman’s shoddy journalism simply doesn’t pass muster.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing