Forged Iraq art used to fund terrorism -UK policeBreaking News
The extent of the scam was not clear but the items, purportedly Iraqi or heirlooms from the region, could each sell for up to a couple of thousand pounds (dollars), according to London police's Arts and Antiques Unit.
"Archaeological stuff is being exported by the ton-load from Middle Eastern countries and (the money) is going back into the Middle East area and some will inevitably end up in the hands of terrorists," Detective Constable Ian Lawson told reporters.
"We know for a fact there is a terrorism link.""There's a trend where items are faked in Iraq and brought into the UK," he said.
comments powered by Disqus
Barrie Lambert - 11/24/2006
Leaving aside the problem of the valuation of fake art works, et al,
this is yet another example of the kind of highly speculative report British police forces seem increasingly fond of making to link pretty much every activity to what I believe George Bush and his advisors refer to as The Long War and the more sensible amongst us as The Loony War.
Take this statement:"(the money) is going back into the Middle East area and some will inevitably end up in the hands of terrorists," Detective Constable Ian Lawson told reporters. Note that "some will inevitably end up in the hands of terrorists" without the obvious qualifier that some money from pretty much any class of transaction - drugs, children's toys, clothes, securities, gambling, etc, in a modern money based entreprenuerial economy will "inevitably end up in the hands of terrorists" because that is the way the economic system works.
Any mention of how much money flows back to "terrorists"? And what forms do these "terrorist" and purely criminal activities take, and how are they distinguished? No.
"We know for a fact there is a terrorism link." Right, but why do you say that you there's a terrorist link? Is this assertive PR or is there some real evidence to back this statement up? If there is real evidence, don't we need to have an indication of its quality to support Detective Constable Ian Lawson's PR moment? Or is it all just fluff in the ether?
- Trump Holds Wide Lead in South Carolina
- An All-or-Nothing Fight for the Supreme Court
- Did Trump Really Lose the Debate?
- Scalia’s Death Sets Off Epic Battle
- Democrats See Gift in GOP Blocking Court Nominee
- Quote of the Day
- The Nastiest GOP Debate
- Reaction to the Republican Debate
- The GOP Presidential Debate
- How Clinton Could Respond on Supreme Court Vacancy
- Trump and Clinton Way Ahead in South Carolina
- McConnell Says Senate Will Wait to Replace Scalia
- Antonin Scalia Is Dead
- Clinton Says Sanders Would Be Threat to Obama Legacy
- Internal Tracker Shows Trump Leading in South Carolina
- Ben Carson used an apparently fake Joseph Stalin quote — and the Internet loved it
- Rubio exaggerates in saying it's been 80 years since a 'lame duck' made a Supreme Court nomination
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges