Norman Finkelstein: Gives talk at Columbia U about Middle EastHistorians in the News
Hundreds of students, professors, administrators, and non-affiliates poured into the auditorium to hear the controversial author's speech, titled "Israel and Palestine: Misuse of Anti-Semitism, Abuse of History." The event was sponsored by a coalition of student groups led by the Muslim Students Association.
Finkelstein criticized Israel's human rights record and concluded that "regardless of intent, Israel is in effect guilty of state terrorism," exacting applause from sections of the auditorium. Finkelstein further alleged that the "only difference between Israel terrorism and Hamas terrorism is that Israeli terrorism is three times as lethal."
The speech marked a period of rising tensions on campus, which has become manifest through the proliferation of fliers and the publication of conflicting student opinions in Spectator.
According to MSA president emeritus and event coordinator Sakib Khan, SEAS '07, the group wanted "to create honest open dialogue on the Israel-Palestine issue," especially in the wake of last year's controversy concerning the Middle East and Asian languages and cultures department.
Allegations of anti-Israel intimidation of students in the MEALAC department emerged in October 2004, leading to the creation of an ad hoc committee to investigate the claims and months of mounted tensions and taboos surrounding discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on campus.
While discussing tactics employed by fabricators of controversy—such as discouraging comparison of Israel's treatment of Palestinians with South African apartheid—Finkelstein criticized University President Lee C. Bollinger's statements in response to a 2002 faculty petition calling for the University's divestment from firms dealings with the Israeli military.
"As president of Columbia ... I want to state clearly that I will not lend any support to this proposal. The petition alleges human rights abuses and compares Israel to South Africa at the time of apartheid, an analogy I believe is both grotesque and offensive," Bollinger wrote.
In response to Bollinger's remarks, Finkelstein declared, "I think it's a sorry truth when the president of... [Columbia] subordinates the pursuit of truth to the pursuit of fundraising."
comments powered by Disqus
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- One of the last remaining Nazis goes on trial in Germany
- Inside story finally told of the young US diplomat who cracked the case of the murder of 4 nuns in El Salvador in 1980
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges