Sweden to probe dark eugenics history
Sweden is now known for its strong social welfare system and outspoken advocacy for human rights, but in the past it has experimented with social engineering. This led to abuses such as the forcible sterilization of around 60,000 women in 1936-76.
In 1922, the National Institute for Race Biology was founded with support from a range of political parties. The first of its kind in the world, the institute investigated whether race was a determining factor in illness or human character traits.
"An over-arching question is to find out more about the kind of society which could develop thinking on race biology and have scientifically accepted research in that area," Education Minister Leif Pagrotsky said in a statement.
The Living History Forum, a government body tasked with spreading "a deeper knowledge about crimes against humanity", was appointed to chart what is known about the Swedish history of eugenics and, if necessary, do more research on the issue.
The Forum was founded by Social Democrat Prime Minister Goran Persson's government in 2003, mainly to improve public knowledge about the Holocaust in which around 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis and their allies from 1933-1945.
The Swedish eugenics research body was merged in the 1950s with a university genetics department.
Other negative aspects of Sweden's past have come to light recently. The government this month promised an official inquiry into claims by thousands of Swedes of physical abuse and cruel treatment in state children's homes for decades from the 1950s.
comments powered by Disqus
- The Memorial Where Slavery Is Real
- Thomas Piketty accuses Germany of forgetting history as it lectures Greece
- Greek ‘No’ May Have Its Roots in Heroic Myths and Real Resistance
- 150 years later, schools are still a battlefield for interpreting Civil War
- Where are America's memorials to pain of slavery, black resistance?
- Historian: "I don’t want my students to simply choose sides in a polemic between heritage and hate"
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.