With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

From Sharpeville to San Francisco and back again

On the anniversary of the Sharpeville massacre, we remember that the global struggle against apartheid involved many allies. It is no coincidence that the formal name for the holiday commemorating Sharpeville is Human Rights Day.   

That name suggests the struggle against apartheid, in fact, was part of a larger and longer series of battles for equal rights and justice for all human beings. Most South Africans know that millions of people from across Africa and the world opposed apartheid in one of the great freedom struggles of modern times.

Among those freedom fighters were many in the San Francisco Bay Area, perhaps the most progressive metropolis in the United States. One, long forgotten player in the city’s anti-apartheid movement was a white Jewish man named Harvey Milk. Milk became the first openly gay politician elected in the United States when he joined the city’s Board of Supervisors (the equivalent of a City Councillor in South Africa) in 1978. 

Milk came of age during the 1960s and early 1970s, a time of great political ferment. Then, social movements seemed to feed off each other as the US civil rights movement inspired students, American Indians, women, Mexican Americans, and many other groups to fight for equal rights, the end of the war in Vietnam, and other forms of social justice.

Milk – such an important figure for gay liberation in 1970s America – actively supported labor unions. He organised with other gay, lesbian, and transgender San Franciscans to convince “gay bars” to boycott Coors beer because that company refused to negotiate with its unionised truck drivers.   

Milk also passionately opposed apartheid. In 1978, he led an effort to expel the South African consulate from his city, San Francisco. Using his power as a supervisor, he authored a resolution to close the consulate and held hearings to lobby the US government to help make that happen.  Milk’s efforts came at a time when few Americans knew anything about the system of oppression ruling South Africa. While the Soweto uprising drastically expanded global awareness of and resistance to apartheid, to most Americans South Africa remained a distant country that was of little concern. 

Milk was an exception. And his struggle to end racial supremacy was intertwined with his own struggle for freedom and dignity as a gay man. He believed that different struggles for freedom and equality were intertwined. To him and others like him, none of us are free, so long as one of us is oppressed – be they homosexuals, working class people, or black South Africans half a world away from San Francisco.  It is important to remember Milk’s opposition to apartheid, today, given the ongoing conflict over homosexuality in South Africa. 

The Rainbow nation frequently receives praise by advocates of equality – rightly so – for taking a bold and unequivocal stance for equality regardless of sexual orientation. First, in South Africa’s inspiring Constitution. Then, in 2006, it became the first nation to legalize same-sex marriage.  These commitments are proof of the humanity displayed by a people who have suffered so much.

Many South Africans, however, remain homophobic.  Rape, murder, and other forms of violence committed against gay South Africans all remain unacceptably high. Every day, gay South Africans suffer despite impressive legal protections. Every year, tens of thousands of LGBT South Africans, especially lesbians, are sexually assaulted.  One Human Rights Watch report entitled “We’ll Show You You’re A Woman,” noted, “South Africa has among the highest rates of reported sexual violence against women in a country not at war.”

Shockingly, perhaps one in every three South African women will be raped in their lifetime though statistics do not exist for lesbian women specifically. 

Horror stories abound of lesbians who were victims of so-called “corrective rape.” How can it be that some men claim that raping a lesbian will convert her into a heterosexual?   This same Human Rights Watch report described how a lesbian girl in a Pietermaritzburg township was raped by an older cousin and infected with HIV. A few years later, another man she knew and had trusted raped her repeatedly and impregnated her. Her family blamed her both times. Then, a local minister raped and impregnated her – yet another man who claimed that raping her would change her into a heterosexual. This woman’s tragic story is all too common. ...

Read entire article at Mail & Guardian Online