The Impeachment VogueRoundup
James Monroe had high hopes for the power of impeachment. It was, he wrote in the eighteen-twenties, “the main spring of the great machine of government…. If preserved in full vigor and exercised with perfect integrity, every branch will perform its duty.” On July 27, 1974—forty years ago this Sunday—the House Judiciary Committee showed more than a little of that vigor and integrity when it voted, by a substantial bipartisan majority, for the first of three articles of impeachment against President Richard Nixon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr., a New Jersey Democrat who served as chairman, had opened the proceedings with a grave benediction: “I pray that we will each act with the wisdom that compels us in the end to be but decent men who seek only the truth. Let us be clear about this. No official, no concerned citizen, no representative, no member of this committee welcomes an impeachment proceeding.”
Yet some very concerned citizens would welcome one today, and eagerly. As we approach August 8th, the anniversary of Nixon’s resignation, impeachment is enjoying a vogue on the right. A tool that was used, in 1974, to safeguard our system of self-rule, and then, in 1998, to help turn a relationship with an intern into a political crisis, is being brandished, in 2014, as one more weapon in the war on government. “Impeach Obama” placards have been a mainstay at Tea Party rallies since at least 2010, but the manufacture of impeachment petitions and other appeals has become, of late, enough of a growth industry that Sarah Palin is looking to take it over. An op-ed at Breitbart.com was her opening bid; in it, she declared that President Obama’s “unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, ‘no mas.’ ”
The Spanish-speaking wife in this scenario is you, America. And although the former governor is a bit vague about the other straws, each one an “impeachable offense,” other advocates have that covered. TeaParty.org, in its bill of particulars against the President, lists ten high crimes and misdemeanors—from Benghazi to illegal wiretapping to the “purposeful” sacrifice of Navy Seals in Afghanistan—while promising that “this petition has only begun to brush the surface.” Another right-wing site lists “100 reasons to impeach Barack Obama,” and even this is probably an act of restraint. A group called Renew America, in its appeal to impeach Obama, “the anti-American, Marxist fiend,” charges the President with a “hell-born plan to destroy our nation as founded,” which has absolutely got to be unconstitutional....
comments powered by Disqus
- U.S. Planned for Military Occupation of Cuba
- New picture emerges of Mata Hari, who faced firing squad 100 years ago
- Massive section of Western Wall and Roman theater uncovered after 1,700 years
- Fight over national monuments intensifies
- Martin Luther: Reluctant reformer who rocked Christianity 500 years ago
- Historian Keri Leigh Merritt defends activist scholars
- Historian digs into the hidden world of Mormon finances
- A historian who became a business professor?
- Allan Lichtman's response to critics of his book that makes the case for Trump’s impeachment
- "Do We Have To Fight Nazis Again?” asks historian Paul Ortiz