Day 2: Highlights of the Annual Meeting of the Organization of American HistoriansHistorians in the News
No sooner had we left the Exhibition Hall than we came upon this scene. It's an historian with his shoes off, seated on the floor. He's on the phone. When he noticed our looking, he explained: There's no escaping committee meetings just because you're at a history conference. We snapped and went on our way.
A short time later we ran into Maureen Nutting, whom we know from Seattle. She was very excited. She'd just returned from one of the scheduled tours. It was a visit to the National Center for Civil and Human Rights, about a ten minute walk from the hotel. (You can't miss it. It's located right next to the Coca Cola museum. Coca Cola donated the land; coincidentally or not, the Center features an exhibit celebrating a landmark event Coca Cola President Robert Woodruff held in defiance of local racists.) As she explains, the exhibits at the Center, which is not quite finished, were designed by the legendary George C. Wolfe, the former artistic director of the Public Theater in NY, in consultation with historians. But we'll let Ms. Nutter explain:
As for today's panels, there seemed to be a theme. Panels devoted to the work of historians drew a lot of historians. This included the panels on Daniel Rodgers (48 in attendance) and Eugene Genovese (41).
The major event of the day was the late-afternoon Plenary session devoted to "historians and their publics." The standout panel included Alan Kraut, Spencer Crew, Jill Lepore, Sean Wilentz, and filmmaker Shola Lynch. Unfortunately, we can't show you a video as one member of the panel objected to cameras. So you'll have to take our word for it that it was a great panel. Wilentz, typically combative, said that historians should use their authority to police the public square. When pundits and politicians (Glen Beck, they're talking about you) make stuff up about history, they should be called out. Lepore said when she tried to do that very thing in her book on the Tea Party historians wondered why on earth she was bothering.
Wilentz got off a great line. Historians, he said, "want to make the alien seem more familiar and the familiar seem more alien." That was something all the panelists seemed to agree with.
comments powered by Disqus
- Hillary Clinton’s 3 debate performances left the Trump campaign in ruins
- Now Austria Says It Will Likely Redesign Hitler's House, Not Tear It Down
- Some looted Idlib National Museum artifacts resurface, fate of others a mystery amidst ‘thriving black market trade’
- Is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau constitutional?
- Poll: Millennials desperately need to bone up on the history of communism
- Does the 'Father' of the 1948 Ethnic Cleansing Narrative Really Want to Recant His Words?
- Max Boot wants to know “what the hell happened to my Republican Party?"
- Conservative historians against Trump sign a petition warning he'd be dangerous
- Benjamin H. Irvin Named OAH Executive Editor
- Historian Diana Ramey Berry praises effort to return the skull of Nat Turner to his family