OAH Executive Board Issues Statement on Dissertation EmbargoesHistorians in the News
tags: Organization of American Historians, embargoes, dissertations
At its fall meeting in Atlanta, Georgia November 16-17, 2013, the executive board of the Organization of American Historians discussed the issue of temporary “embargoes” on newly completed PhD dissertations.
In the academic world, a dissertation embargo usually means withholding public circulation of dissertations in print or digital form for a predetermined period of time, usually no more than five or six years. It provides authors with the prerogative of determining the most advantageous modes of publishing their work without having their dissertations already available, especially in digital form, almost immediately after a PhD is granted. The following statement reflects the board’s unanimous view of this important subject.
The OAH Executive Board strongly supports the right of authors to make their own decisions about the manner in which their doctoral dissertations will be published and circulated. The board urges history departments and graduate school administrations to support that right without qualification, understanding that embargoed dissertations will be available for public consultation upon the expiration of the designated embargo period.
Doctoral research and scholarship typically takes three to five years to complete, a significant investment of time and resources in the lifetime of any individual. In the discipline of history, publication of the scholarship and research embodied in the PhD dissertation is often a prerequisite of employment and professional advancement.
“In an era when information in digital form can be circulated with unprecedented speed, it is more vital than ever to preserve the prerogative of newly minted PhD’s to decide for themselves where and how their work is to be disseminated so that it will most benefit their career trajectories,” said OAH President Alan M. Kraut, University Professor of History at American University. “It is well worth the temporary inconvenience of an embargo for a specified period of time to help our newest colleagues to best benefit from the fruits of their first labors.”
The OAH Executive Board urges history departments and graduate schools to provide doctoral candidates with ample information about embargo options and procedures at their respective institutions. It further encourages advisers and students to consult with each other about the advantages and disadvantages of embargoing a dissertation, leaving the final decision entirely to the individual student.
* * *
About the Organization of American Historians
Founded in 1907, the Organization of American Historians promotes excellence in the scholarship, teaching, and presentation of American history, and encourages wide discussion of historical questions and equitable treatment of all practitioners of history. Our diverse membership of eight thousand individuals includes college and university professors, high school teachers, archivists, museum curators, public historians, students, and a variety of scholars employed in government and the private sector. For more information, visit http://www.oah.org
comments powered by Disqus
- Male Historians Have Long Dominated Public Debates. Is Charlottesville a Turning Point?
- Kevin Levin says he’s changed his mind about Confederate statues
- Scholar of African history says his Jewish background didn’t stop him from writing about Muslims and Africa
- Jon Meacham points out why Lee should go but Washington should stay
- "I've studied the history of Confederate memorials. Here's what to do about them."