The Founding Fathers Would Be Shocked at Our Religious Ignorance
The founding fathers saw the American people's faith and knowledge as integral to the well-being of the republic. Religion, they believed, teaches people about their moral obligations before God and the fundamental equality of all people, while good education trains us in the enlightening wisdom of the ages. If the recently-released Pew Forum Religious Knowledge Survey is any indication, Americans are in trouble in both religion and education. It reveals a lack of religious substance and understanding that the founders would have found deplorable.
George Washington held that religion and schooling—in that order—were necessary components of virtue, the benevolent spirit that preserved civil society and good government. "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity," he said in his Farewell Address of 1796, "religion and morality are indispensable supports. . .Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." But Washington did not disparage learning, either, as he recommended that Americans continually promote "institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened." An ignorant, immoral people, the founders feared, would act and vote on selfish motives alone, steered by the sensational promises of demagogues.
Often the founders joined religion and education, as they did in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the last great piece of legislation under the Articles of Confederation. There the Congress mandated that all new states set up systems for public education. Why? Because, the law said, "Religion, morality, and knowledge [are] necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind." Most of the early colonial colleges, including Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, were originally designed to train pastors.
Yet today we see evidence that both deeply reflective faith, and the learning that has traditionally accompanied it, are in decline. To be sure, this trend does not relate to religious knowledge alone: in the same poll, 41% of respondents could not identify Joseph Biden as our current vice president. But the religious findings of the Pew survey are sobering: only half of respondents could identify the Qur'an as the Muslim holy book, while less than half knew that Martin Luther helped to start the Protestant Reformation. Perhaps most depressing for a country that is disproportionately Protestant and evangelical, less than 20 percent recognized salvation by faith alone as a distinctive of Protestant theology. Jonathan Edwards, the leading theologian of the Great Awakening of the eighteenth century, and the author of the haunting sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," was identified correctly by only 11 percent of respondents. Many of us don't know the basic features of world religions, but we seem to know even less about our own theological traditions and history.
One theme that seems strangely consistent between the Pew survey and the religion of the founders is that the most skeptical people still know a great deal about religion. Atheists did the best on the Pew survey, and in the founding era, even the most skeptical deists were deeply familiar with Christianity and other world religions. Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin exemplified the combination of personal skepticism and understanding of—even respect for—religion, at least in an "enlightened" form.
But here is where the similarity between the modern skeptics and those of 1776 probably ends, for today's atheists, at least the most vociferous among them, do not afford faith the kind of respect that Jefferson and Franklin did. Jefferson and Franklin were by no means atheists: they definitely believed that God existed and deserved veneration. In his first inaugural address as president, Jefferson commended Americans' "benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man." Jefferson believed that the First Amendment had created a "wall of separation between church and state," yet he was quite comfortable with public displays of religion, and he regularly attended church services in Congress's chambers as president.
Franklin likewise worked closely with his friend, the great Anglican revivalist George Whitefield, even though Franklin and Whitefield did not see eye-to-eye on theology. Franklin also tried—unsuccessfully—to get the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to open its sessions with prayer, an unusual request from one of the Convention's few open deists.
So whether devout or skeptical, the founding fathers would have agreed that an informed religious faith boosted America's civic health. They would have been alarmed at evidence that suggests that Americans widely profess to be religious, but that their religion is often based on little knowledge of the basic tenets of faith. Not only is this bad for faith communities: religious ignorance is bad for the life of the republic, too.
comments powered by Disqus
Larry Linn - 10/10/2010
My grandparents were Christians in Northern Ireland. She was Protestant, and he was Catholic. They had to flee after death threats.
I volunteered and joined the Army, and I served as an 11B Infantryman. Most of my time in the field was in squad or platoon size operations. We would have discussions about what we were fighting for. It always came back to the “Bill of Rights”. To me the most important was “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
What did our Founding Fathers have to say about religion:
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson (letter to Peter Carr, 10 August 1787):
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason;
"Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.", John Madison;
“Lighthouses are more helpful than Churches”, Benjamin Franklin
John Willingham - 10/8/2010
The Texas State Board of Education serves as a laboratory for restricting knowledge: evolution, history, economics, women and minorities. HNN has a series of articles on these developments, and the actions of the Texas board are widely discussed on hundreds of internet and print sites.
J R Willis - 10/7/2010
Would you kindly document this trend of restriction, and the specific subjects/content? I am very interested in these sweeping claims as projected from all sides of the argument.
Elizabeth Cregan - 10/5/2010
I was thinking the same thing as I read this. I cannot come up with an equivelant to today's fundamentalism (in any religion) to the past. Yes, religion acts to teach a sense of moral obligation, which when paired with a proper education, becomes a sense of honor and duty which is necesary to maintain society. BUT, fundamentalism seems to destroy respect of others, and of education and therefore falls short of instilling honor. I often cringe at the thought of what the founders would think of us today
John Willingham - 10/5/2010
Professor Kidd, thank you for your article and the work that you and your colleagues do at Baylor.
I agree that the founders you mention would be alarmed at the lack of religious knowledge. But Jefferson, Franklin, and probably Washington, too, might have been much more concerned by the negative influence that dogmatic religion has had on education.
In your state (and my home state),the board of education seeks to restrict students' exposure to knowledge in all fields--especially social studies and science--if the knowledge generated by the academy is contrary to narrow religious beliefs held by members of the education board.
So, yes, we need religious knowledge, but what we must have is knowledge that is not determined by religion. That is the kind of knowledge that the founders you mention would value above all and that, I suspect, they would see as guiding us toward better religious understanding as well.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- How Does It Feel To Have One’s Work as a Historian Cited by the Supreme Court? Cool. Very Cool. Thank You Very Much.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing