George Washington's Philadelphia Slave Quarters
Why is this? Why should the building which served as the Executive Mansion of the United States for ten years while the national capital was under construction, the house in which Washington and Adams lived for the lion's shares of their presidencies, the seat of the executive branch of the Federal government from 1790 to 1800 be so obscure?
The President's House stood on the south side of Market Street, about 500 feet north of Independence Hall. The site is now part of Independence Mall, and the Liberty Bell Pavilion sits just to the east of it in what had been the president's garden. A public bathroom has occupied the house site for the past 48 years.
A new building to house the bell is under construction less than 100 feet from the old one, and this Liberty Bell Center will partially cover the site of the backbuildings of the President's House property. Under the new cener's porch will be the smokehouse and its addition.
Washington moved into the President's House in late November 1790, with a household staff of about 24 -- 16 or so white servants, and 8 black slaves. He had spent most of the autumn at Mount Vernon, leaving his secretary to prepare the Philadelphia house. The semi-weekly correspondence between the two contains a treasure trove of detail about the mansion, including Washington's instructions about where the servants should be housed. He initially discussed converting part of the hayloft into lodging rooms, then considered walling off a section of the servants' hall, but finally decided to use the smokehouse. The secretary acknowledged the president's order in an October 31, 1790 letter: "The Smoke-House will be extended to the end of the Stable, and two good rooms made in it for the accommodation of the Stable people." Subsequent letters between them confirm the order.
The "Stable people" consisted of the white coachman, A. Dunn, two black slaves, Giles and Paris, and a likely third, Austin. The smokehouse was small, about 8 1/2 feet square on the interior, and the addition slightly larger, about 8 1/2 by 11 1/2 feet. (The dimensions are recorded on a 1785 map of the property.) According to French exile Moreau de Saint-Mery, segregation in 1790s Philadelphia was so great that white servants would not eat at the same table with free blacks, let alone slaves. Washington instructed that the household's other black men be housed in a room to themselves in the attic of the main house. Rather than mix the races in the smokehouse, it seems likely that the president would have given Dunn the small room to himself, and Giles, Paris and Austin, the larger one.
Independence National Historical Park (INHP) vehemently objects to the addition to the smokehouse being called a slave quarters. In April, an INHP historian questioned whether the addition was even built, although, a month later, the parks preliminary report on the history and interpretation of the house acknowledged that it was. Another INHP official stated that where the slaves lived cannot be established with any certainty, and that all types of servants - wage-earners, indentured servants, slaves lived by the stables. This statement is true only over time. Dunn was a wage-earner; Washington later replaced the stable slaves with white German indentured servants, although the earliest record of this was not until 1792. The INHP final report deftly avoids the controversy by calling the smokehouse and its addition "housing quarters."
The use of this euphemism may have contributed to the recent comments in the Philadelphia Inquirer by an INHP spokesman: primary documents call [the rear of the Presidents House] the servants hall; [there are no historical records] that said it was a slave quarters; and we are standing with the fact that no one knows if slaves slept there or if slaves didnt sleep there. The story was picked up by the Associated Press, and published in the New York Times and elsewhere.
Actually, the servants hall (to the east of the kitchen ell) and the addition to the smokehouse (to the south of the ell) were different spaces. The servants hall was also called the refectory, or dining hall. In his letters, Washington accounted for housing all the servants elsewhere, so it seems likely that none of them, black or white, slept in the servants hall.
Why is INHP bending over backwards to avoid dealing with slavery in the Presidents House? The park took over operation of the Mall in 1974, the same year that an INHP report confirmed that the blacks in Washingtons presidential household were slaves rather than free. The presence of the slaves is not mentioned on the interpretive panel outside the public bathroom, although the park has had sole responsibility for interpreting the site for the past 28 years. INHP statements (including one on its Web site) imply that everyone has known all along that Washington had slaves in Philadelphia, assertions which just make people angry. Five hundred protesters who had only recently learned of the presence of the slaves demonstrated at the site on July 3rd. INHPs confused claim that there was no slave quarters will only increase public hostility and mistrust.
Fortunately, things seem to be changing. The Philadelphia City Council and the Pennsylvania Legislature passed unanimous resolutions urging INHP to commemorate the Presidents House and its slaves, and the U.S. House of Representatives attached an amendment to the 2003 budget of the Department of the Interior requiring it to do so. Progress on the commemoration was made at an October 31 meeting of National Park Service and INHP officials, community leaders, historians, and designers. Additional meetings are scheduled, and a public meeting is promised.
As in The Sixth Sense, the Presidents House site has its ghosts. Future visitors to the Liberty Bell will walk across its entire footprint, including the quarters of the stable slaves, as they approach the new Liberty Bell Center building. After 200 years of obscurity, it now appears that the house and the lives of its less-illustrious inhabitants will be remembered.
comments powered by Disqus
M.A. White - 6/25/2003
On June 24, 2003 the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)Radio division conducted an interview with a woman regarding the restoration of a Whiskey Brewery located @ GW's Mt. Vernon Estate in N.Y. The tone of the interview troubled me and the content, disturbing in its omission. The interview was light, jovial, laced with laughter and hype about GW's plantation prowess and his pioneering of "vertical integration". That the Brewery was about to be reactivated was seen as news.
Now, I have never visited the Estate at Mt. Vernon and maybe now I will. But I have read the history books and it concerns me that no one ever wants to mention that GW was a recognized Slave Owner. Not only did he own slaves, he did very little to free them in his lifetime. He did not free them until after he died in 1799 by way of a provision in his will. At the time of his death he is said to have 316 slaves who worked the plantation's five farms and grist mill, while other's worked in carpentry, masonry and blacksmithing. Most of the cooks, butlers and servants were slaves. Now that is no laughing matter. But it is certainly pertinent, don't you think?
In conclusion, the i/view would have had more depth, provided more meaning and insight for listeners and demonstrated more sensitivity had the interviewer raised the question of the real source of GW's capitalist prosperity. As it was, the message was clear: the glitter of capitalism will always eclipse it's ignoble beginnings; Brewery's are more profound than Blacks in bondage; exploiters will always be celebrated more than the exploited and the renovation of vestiges of slavery is more newsworthy than the reparations of those injured by slavery.
Now that's no laughing matter.
seth - 12/9/2002
Al Hibler - 12/5/2002
With our liberties at stake more than ever by both foreign and internal influences, it is important that we come to grips with the truth of our past, and learn our lessons from the past so they are not repeated. Yes, it is a shame that President Washington brought slave to the capital, but it was part of the era of which he lived. Hurray to those who had the courage to bring it into the open, and not conceal it! That's a strong America.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- How Does It Feel To Have One’s Work as a Historian Cited by the Supreme Court? Cool. Very Cool. Thank You Very Much.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing